Enforce your copyright and stop unauthorised use of your creative works
Copyright infringement occurs when a third party reproduces, distributes, performs, or adapts your original work without authorisation. India's Copyright Act, 1957 provides civil and criminal remedies including injunctions, damages, and imprisonment. Our team helps rights holders identify infringement, send cease and desist notices, and pursue court action or administrative remedies to protect their creative and literary assets.
Copyright in India is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957, as amended most recently by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012. The Act protects original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, cinematograph films, and sound recordings. Protection is automatic upon creation and fixation of the work — no registration is required for the right to exist. However, registration with the Copyright Office under Section 44 of the Act creates a public record and is treated as prima facie evidence of ownership in any dispute or court proceeding. Infringement occurs under Section 51 of the Copyright Act when any person, without the licence of the owner or the Registrar of Copyrights, does anything that only the owner is exclusively entitled to do. This includes reproduction, communication to the public, adaptation, translation, and distribution. Infringement also extends to facilitating access to infringing copies through digital platforms, websites, or physical channels. The Act distinguishes between primary infringement, which is a direct act by the infringer, and secondary infringement, which involves dealing in infringing copies or enabling infringement by others. The remedies available under the Copyright Act are both civil and criminal. On the civil side, the owner may approach a District Court of competent jurisdiction to seek an injunction restraining further infringement, delivery up of infringing copies, damages including conversion damages equal to the market value of the goods, and accounts of profits earned by the infringer. The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 strengthened provisions relating to digital infringement and introduced technological protection measures under Sections 65A and 65B, making it an offence to circumvent such measures. Criminal remedies under Section 63 of the Act provide for imprisonment of not less than six months extendable up to three years and a fine of not less than fifty thousand rupees extendable up to two lakh rupees for the first offence. Repeat offences attract higher penalties. The police may search and seize infringing copies without a warrant under Section 64, which makes the Copyright Act one of the more powerful enforcement statutes in Indian intellectual property law. The process of taking action against infringement typically begins with gathering evidence of the infringing act. This may involve forensic documentation of the infringing content, purchase of infringing copies, website screenshots with metadata, or engagement of a private investigator. Once sufficient evidence is assembled, a legal notice or cease and desist letter is issued to the infringer, demanding that they stop the infringing activity immediately, remove or destroy infringing copies, and pay compensation. A well-drafted notice citing specific sections of the Copyright Act and the registration details of the work often leads to prompt settlement without litigation. Where the infringer does not respond or comply, civil proceedings are initiated before the appropriate District Court. An application for an ad interim injunction is typically filed simultaneously with the suit so that the court can restrain the infringer immediately while the main matter is adjudicated. India's courts have consistently granted urgent relief in copyright cases where the plaintiff can demonstrate originality of the work, prima facie infringement, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. For digital and online infringement, rights holders may additionally approach internet service providers with takedown notices under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. Intermediaries who receive adequate notice are obligated to act expeditiously to disable access to the infringing content. This route is particularly effective for infringement on social media platforms, streaming services, and e-commerce marketplaces. Common mistakes that rights holders make include delaying action after discovering infringement, which allows the infringer to continue profiting and makes the calculation of damages more complex. Another frequent error is approaching the infringer informally or publicly without preserving legal rights. Insufficient documentation is also a recurring problem — courts require clear, admissible evidence of both the original work and the infringing act. Engaging an experienced intellectual property attorney from the outset ensures that evidence is preserved correctly, notices are drafted to maximise settlement prospects, and court filings comply with procedural requirements under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the relevant High Court rules.
Authors, musicians, software developers, film producers, photographers, artists, publishers, and companies that own creative content — including those whose works are being copied or distributed online without authorisation — benefit from copyright infringement action services. Startups in the content, media, and technology sectors frequently encounter digital piracy and require swift legal intervention.
⚠️ Penalty for Non-Compliance
Continued infringement may result in civil liability for damages and accounts of profits, and criminal liability under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 carrying imprisonment of six months to three years and fines of up to two lakh rupees per offence.
Evidence Gathering and Assessment
Document the infringing act comprehensively through screenshots, purchase of infringing copies, metadata capture, and notarisation. Conduct ownership verification and assess the strength of the claim.
Cease and Desist Notice
Issue a formal legal notice under the Copyright Act, 1957 citing specific infringements, demanding immediate cessation, removal of infringing copies, and compensation. Set a firm compliance deadline.
Online Takedown (if applicable)
File takedown notices with platforms, ISPs, and marketplaces under the IT (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules, 2021, compelling removal of infringing content within the prescribed timeframe.
Civil Suit and Injunction
File a civil suit before the competent District Court seeking permanent injunction, damages, and delivery up. Simultaneously apply for ad interim injunction to obtain immediate court-ordered restraint.
Criminal Complaint (if warranted)
File a criminal complaint before the Judicial Magistrate or approach police for a search and seizure operation under Section 64 of the Copyright Act in cases of deliberate commercial piracy.
Resolution and Enforcement
Negotiate settlement, execute consent terms, or pursue the matter to decree and enforcement. Ensure infringing copies are destroyed and compensation is received.
Items marked Required are mandatory; others are situational.
Ownership and Registration
Source files, original drafts, creation timestamps
If previously registered with the Copyright Office
Evidence of Infringement
Where applicable for commercial piracy
Financial and Commercial Records
Required to substantiate damages claims
Government Fees
Court filing fees (civil suit)
Varies by court and relief sought; typically calculated on value of suit
Copyright registration (if not yet registered)
Per work for literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic works (Form XIV)
Criminal complaint filing
No court fee for criminal complaints
Professional Fees
Legal assessment and strategy
Quoted on review of your specific case
Cease and desist notice drafting
Quoted on review of your specific case
Platform takedown notices
Quoted on review of your specific case
Civil suit filing and court representation
Quoted on review of your specific case
Criminal complaint and police coordination
Quoted on review of your specific case
* Government fees may vary. GST applicable on professional fees. Final pricing confirmed after review.
No, copyright registration under Section 44 of the Copyright Act, 1957 is not mandatory for the right to exist or for filing an infringement suit. Copyright subsists automatically upon creation and fixation of the original work. However, registration with the Copyright Office creates a public record and is treated as prima facie evidence of ownership and validity in court proceedings, which significantly strengthens the rights holder's position during litigation. Registration is therefore strongly advisable before taking action.
Under Article 60 of the Limitation Act, 1963, a suit for infringement of copyright must be filed within three years from the date on which the infringement first occurred. However, where infringement is continuous or ongoing, the cause of action is treated as recurring, and the three-year period runs from each fresh act of infringement. It is advisable to initiate action as soon as infringement is discovered to preserve the full range of remedies and avoid complications in calculating damages.
Yes. Courts in India routinely grant ad interim injunctions in copyright cases at the time of filing or shortly thereafter, provided the plaintiff can demonstrate a prima facie case of ownership and infringement, that the balance of convenience favours the plaintiff, and that irreparable harm will result if relief is not granted. These interim orders can immediately restrain the infringer from continuing the infringing activity while the main suit is adjudicated, which may take months or years to conclude.
Under the Copyright Act, 1957, the rights holder may recover actual damages suffered as a result of the infringement, conversion damages equivalent to the market value of infringing copies, and accounts of profits earned by the infringer. The court also has discretion to award additional punitive damages in cases of flagrant infringement. Legal costs may also be awarded. The quantum of damages depends on evidence of actual loss, the scale of infringement, and the infringer's revenues from the infringing activity.
Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 prescribes imprisonment of not less than six months extendable up to three years, and a fine of not less than fifty thousand rupees extendable up to two lakh rupees for knowingly infringing copyright. For repeat offences, the minimum imprisonment is one year and the minimum fine is one lakh rupees. The police may search and seize infringing copies without a warrant under Section 64, and the offence is cognisable in cases of second and subsequent convictions.
Rights holders may send takedown notices to intermediaries including websites, social media platforms, ISPs, and e-commerce marketplaces under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. Intermediaries are required to acknowledge such notices within twenty-four hours and take down infringing content within seventy-two hours of receipt. A valid notice must identify the infringing content, state the basis of the rights holder's claim, and provide contact information. Courts may also issue John Doe orders compelling platforms to remove content.
A John Doe order, known in Indian courts as an Ashok Kumar order, is an ex parte injunction granted against unknown defendants and served on ISPs, hosting providers, and platforms to block access to infringing content or websites even before the specific infringer is identified. Indian High Courts, particularly the Delhi and Bombay High Courts, have granted such orders extensively in film, music, and publishing piracy cases. These orders are particularly effective for restraining online piracy at the time of a major release.
Yes. Computer programmes are expressly included in the definition of literary works under Section 2(o) of the Copyright Act, 1957 as amended. Software code, including source code and object code, is protected from the moment of creation. Infringement includes unauthorised copying, distribution, and making adaptations of the software. The 2012 Amendment also addressed technological protection measures used in software. Software companies may take both civil and criminal action under the Copyright Act in addition to contract remedies.
Yes, Indian courts have exercised jurisdiction over foreign-hosted platforms where the infringing content targets Indian audiences or the copyright owner is Indian. Courts have issued blocking orders directing the Department of Telecommunications and Indian ISPs to block access to infringing foreign websites under both the Copyright Act and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Rights holders may also pursue parallel action under the laws of the jurisdiction where the platform is hosted, including DMCA notices for US-based platforms.
Go deeper on any part of the process.
Our experts will review your case and respond within 1 business day.
Handled by verified compliance experts. 100% online process.
Related Services
Other Intellectual Property services
Trademark Registration
Register your brand name, logo, or tagline across 45 NICE classes
Trademark Renewal
Renew your trademark before the 10-year expiry — avoid losing your brand
Trademark Objection Reply
Reply to Trademark Examination Report within 30 days to save your application
Trademark Rectification
Remove or correct a wrongly registered trademark from the IP India Register
International Trademark (Madrid Protocol)
Protect your brand in 130+ countries with a single Madrid Protocol filing
Patent Registration in India
80% fee rebate for DPIIT startups — from prior art search to grant
Copyright Infringement Action
Free quote · Reply in 1 business day