Mandatory independent audit of corporate legal and secretarial compliance for prescribed companies under the Companies Act, 2013
Mandatory for listed companies and companies above ₹50cr paid-up capital or ₹250cr turnover — get your Form MR-3 audit from a Practising Company Secretary.
Secretarial Audit was introduced in India by the Companies Act, 2013 as a tool to strengthen corporate governance, promote transparency, and provide an independent check on a company's compliance with the complex web of laws that govern its operations. Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 mandates the secretarial audit for prescribed classes of companies and requires that the audit report in Form MR-3 be annexed to the Board's Report, making it a publicly available document filed with the Registrar of Companies. The Institute of Company Secretaries of India has issued the Guidance Note on Secretarial Audit and the Secretarial Standards, which together define the professional framework within which the audit is conducted. Only a Practising Company Secretary holding a Certificate of Practice issued by the ICSI is authorised to conduct a secretarial audit and sign Form MR-3. The auditor expresses an opinion on whether the company has complied with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules made thereunder; the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and its Rules; the Depositories Act, 1996; the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and its Rules in so far as they relate to Foreign Direct Investment, Overseas Direct Investment, and External Commercial Borrowings; the Regulations and Guidelines prescribed under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, including the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 for listed companies, the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, and the Takeover Code; the Secretarial Standards issued by ICSI; and other laws specifically applicable to the company depending on its nature of business. The audit covers the entire financial year and examines the company's registers, minutes books, resolutions, filings with the Registrar of Companies, disclosures made to stock exchanges, related party transactions, board composition and committee structures, appointment and remuneration of directors and key managerial personnel, share capital transactions including allotments, buybacks, and transfers, and any corporate actions taken during the year. The auditor also reviews whether the Board of Directors has met with the requisite frequency, whether notice periods have been observed, whether quorum requirements have been satisfied at Board and general meetings, and whether required disclosures have been made under the Insider Trading Regulations. The Board of Directors is required to appoint the Secretarial Auditor for a financial year before the end of that financial year, although the report itself is typically completed and annexed to the Board's Report after the year-end. If the auditor has observed any non-compliance, qualification, or adverse remark, such observations must be specifically explained in the Board's Report. The appointment of the Secretarial Auditor is itself a board-level decision and must be recorded in the minutes of the Board meeting. Common compliance gaps identified during secretarial audits include delays in filing annual returns and financial statements with the Registrar of Companies, non-compliance with the mandatory CSR spending requirements under Section 135, lapses in maintaining statutory registers in the prescribed format, failure to file required intimations with stock exchanges within the prescribed timelines, incorrect composition of Audit Committees and Nomination and Remuneration Committees, and gaps in related party transaction disclosures. Expert assistance is critical in secretarial audit not only because the statutory mandate requires a Practising Company Secretary, but also because the scope of laws reviewed is broad and the inter-linkages between corporate law, securities law, foreign exchange law, and sector-specific regulations require specialist knowledge. A well-conducted secretarial audit provides the Board of Directors with an independent assurance that the company's compliance machinery is functioning effectively and flags emerging risk areas before they escalate into regulatory action.
Secretarial Audit under Section 204 is mandatory for every listed company, every public company with a paid-up share capital of ₹50 crore or more, and every public company with a turnover of ₹250 crore or more. The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 further extended the mandate to every private company which is a subsidiary of a public company falling within these thresholds. Growing private companies approaching these thresholds benefit from voluntary secretarial audits as a governance best practice ahead of IPO or fundraising.
⚠️ Penalty for Non-Compliance
Failure to conduct a secretarial audit as required under Section 204 exposes the company and every officer in default to a penalty of ₹1 lakh, extendable to ₹5 lakh under Section 204(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 as amended. Qualifications and adverse remarks in the secretarial audit report may trigger regulatory scrutiny by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs or SEBI.
Appoint the Secretarial Auditor
The Board of Directors must pass a resolution appointing a Practising Company Secretary as Secretarial Auditor for the financial year. The appointment should ideally be made at the beginning of the financial year to allow the auditor to review compliance on a running basis rather than only at year-end.
Initial Planning and Scoping Meeting
The Secretarial Auditor meets with the company's Company Secretary and compliance team to understand the company's business, applicable laws specific to its sector, any corporate actions taken during the year, and any known compliance issues. The auditor prepares a list of documents and information required for the audit.
Document Collection and Review
The company provides the auditor access to all statutory registers, minutes books, ROC filings, stock exchange disclosures, board and committee resolutions, share capital records, and other documents for the financial year under review. The auditor verifies each compliance requirement against the evidence of compliance.
Issue of Queries and Management Responses
Where the auditor identifies gaps, delays, or potential non-compliances, the auditor raises queries with management. The company's compliance team provides clarifications and supporting evidence. This iterative process allows genuine errors to be distinguished from systemic non-compliance.
Draft Report and Management Comments
The auditor prepares a draft Form MR-3 report setting out the scope, findings, and any qualifications or observations. Management is given an opportunity to review the draft and provide comments on factual accuracy before the report is finalised.
Finalise and Submit Form MR-3
The Practising Company Secretary signs and dates the final Form MR-3 report and provides it to the company for annexure to the Board's Report. The Board's Report must specifically comment on any qualifications or adverse remarks in the secretarial audit report. The signed report is then filed as part of the annual filings with the Registrar of Companies.
Items marked Required are mandatory; others are situational.
Corporate Records
Securities and Disclosures (Listed Companies)
Transactions and Approvals
Required if any cross-border investment transactions occurred during the year
Financial and Reporting
Required for companies to which Section 135 CSR mandate applies
Government Fees
Filing fees for Annual Return and Board's Report (inclusive of Form MR-3)
Payable to MCA as per the ROC filing fee schedule applicable to the company's authorised share capital; typically ₹600 to ₹3,000 for Form MGT-7
Professional Fees
Secretarial Audit Fees (Practising Company Secretary)
Quoted on review of your specific case
Ongoing Corporate Compliance Retainer (optional)
Quoted on review of your specific case
* Government fees may vary. GST applicable on professional fees. Final pricing confirmed after review.
Under Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, secretarial audit is mandatory for: every listed company; every public company having a paid-up share capital of ₹50 crore or more; every public company having a turnover of ₹250 crore or more; and, following the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, every private company that is a subsidiary of a public company which itself falls within any of the above thresholds. The thresholds are checked as at the end of the preceding financial year.
Only a Practising Company Secretary — that is, a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India who holds a valid Certificate of Practice — is authorised to conduct a secretarial audit and sign Form MR-3 under Section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013. A Company Secretary employed by the company (in whole-time employment) cannot sign Form MR-3 as auditor for that company. The auditor must be independent of the company and must not have any disqualifying interest as prescribed under the Act and the ICSI guidelines.
The scope of Form MR-3 encompasses the Companies Act, 2013 and Rules; the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; the Depositories Act, 1996; FEMA, 1999 in relation to FDI, ODI, and ECB; SEBI Act, 1992 and all Regulations and Guidelines thereunder including SEBI (LODR), SEBI (ICDR), the Takeover Code, and Insider Trading Regulations; and Secretarial Standards issued by ICSI. The auditor also covers sector-specific laws applicable to the company's business, such as RBI regulations for banking and NBFC companies or IRDAI regulations for insurance companies.
The Secretarial Audit Report in Form MR-3 must be annexed to the Board's Report for the relevant financial year under Rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. The Board's Report, along with the annexed Form MR-3, is filed with the Registrar of Companies as part of the Annual Report. For companies following a financial year ending March 31, the Annual Return in Form MGT-7 and financial statements must be filed within sixty days and thirty days respectively of the Annual General Meeting, which must be held within six months of year-end. Accordingly, the secretarial audit report must be completed within this timeline.
Form MR-3 is the prescribed format for the Secretarial Audit Report as specified in Annexure to Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014. The report follows a structured format covering: the scope of the audit and the auditor's responsibility; a list of all laws reviewed; the auditor's opinion on compliance with each applicable law; specific qualifications, reservations, or adverse remarks; and the place and date of signing. The report is addressed to the members of the company and signed by the Practising Company Secretary with their membership number and Certificate of Practice number.
When the Secretarial Auditor gives a qualified opinion, reservation, or adverse remark in Form MR-3, the Board of Directors is required under the Companies Act, 2013 to specifically explain each such qualification or adverse remark in the Board's Report. A failure to adequately explain qualifications may attract regulatory scrutiny from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs or, in the case of listed companies, from SEBI. Repeated adverse remarks across years can signal systemic governance failures and may trigger inspection of the company's books by MCA or SEBI.
Under Section 204(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, if a company or any officer of the company is in default with respect to the secretarial audit requirement, the company and every officer in default shall be punishable with a penalty of not less than ₹1 lakh, which may extend to ₹5 lakh. Following the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, this is a civil penalty levied by the Registrar of Companies and does not require court prosecution. The Adjudicating Officer has the power to impose the penalty after providing the defaulter an opportunity of being heard.
Yes. A private company that does not fall within the prescribed thresholds may voluntarily appoint a Practising Company Secretary to conduct a secretarial audit. Voluntary secretarial audits are particularly valuable for private companies preparing for an IPO, private equity investment, or significant debt fundraising, as they identify compliance gaps well in advance of due diligence by investors or lenders. Investors and institutional lenders increasingly expect evidence of robust legal compliance as part of their investment covenants, and a clean secretarial audit report provides this assurance.
The statutory audit conducted under Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 by a Chartered Accountant examines the financial statements of the company to give an opinion on whether they present a true and fair view of the company's financial position in accordance with Accounting Standards. The secretarial audit conducted under Section 204 by a Practising Company Secretary examines the company's compliance with corporate and securities laws and procedural requirements — such as board meeting conduct, statutory filings, disclosure obligations, and share capital transactions — and gives an opinion on legal compliance rather than financial accuracy. The two audits are complementary and together provide a comprehensive independent review of the company's affairs.
Go deeper on any part of the process.
Our experts will review your case and respond within 1 business day.
Valid for: Annual (per financial year)
Handled by verified compliance experts. 100% online process.
Related Services
Other Compliance services
Udyam MSME Registration
Free, instant MSME certificate — gateway to collateral-free loans and government tenders
Bookkeeping & Accounting
Monthly books, GST reconciliation, TDS filing, and MIS reports
EPF / PF Registration
Employer EPF registration with EPFO — mandatory above 20 employees
Pvt Ltd Annual Compliance
AOC-4 + MGT-7 + statutory audit + board minutes + Director KYC
LLP Annual Compliance
Form 11 (Annual Return) + Form 8 (Accounts) + Income Tax Return
Company Name Change
MCA-approved company name change via special resolution and INC-24 filing
Secretarial Audit (Form MR-3)
Free quote · Reply in 1 business day